RecTeq turning off app remote start up feature?

The plot thickens and I may have made some bets Ray wasn't
lying.

View attachment 21379

View attachment 21380
This was the essence of my rant. I didn’t think there was a regulatory basis for this item. It was purely a business decision. As such, the consumer should be allowed redress for the removal of a paid for function. See my discussion about sharp knives in this thread.
 
WOW that was a long post...but I enjoyed it... I also hear what you're saying . However, you probably wont like my rebuttal. If you haven't seen my other later posts, Im only going to say that I talked directly to Ray (he's not hacked lol) and long story short I believe him that its a industry wide regulation / U.S. Govt ordeal. I also believe it was handled poorly but at the same time, his response was leaked so it left him high and dry imo... Cut left, cut right, it didn't matter...he was already tackled for a loss. His answers to why he wont say the agency etc.. made perfect sense to me in our current America and political climate. Thanks all I can say to you, other than, give him a call yourself so that you can ask the questions and receive the answers you want.
Buckeye, Thanks for keeping it professional. Can someone contact Ray so he can cite the regulation(s) that seem to be driving this change. So far I see a lot of company speak but I don’t see anyone at RT taking the high road and placing the reason squarely on the government by giving us the actual law/reg that forced this change. If you happen to talk to him again, can you ask for the specific citation so I can post if an put an end to our concern that we are being deceived by a company that is blaming our good regulatory authorities for this change. That is only fair to all the hard working government officials that seem to be taking the hit for statements he is making. I would hate to think anyone would slander our citizens that work for the government with false blame. I know he is better than that.
 
You can keep the discussion private but what regulation did he cite so I/we can look it up. I work in the regulatory side of business and have not seen the reg you/he mentioned promulgated. Nor have I seen the Notice of Public Rulemaking that allows the citizens of this country to respond to the pending release of said regulation. Please advise so I can do the needed research to see and understand/corroborate this information. Thanks in advance.
He wouldnt say, but Nerdygrl just posted some new info that doesnt look good.
 
\
Buckeye, Thanks for keeping it professional. Can someone contact Ray so he can cite the regulation(s) that seem to be driving this change. So far I see a lot of company speak but I don’t see anyone at RT taking the high road and placing the reason squarely on the government by giving us the actual law/reg that forced this change. If you happen to talk to him again, can you ask for the specific citation so I can post if an put an end to our concern that we are being deceived by a company that is blaming our good regulatory authorities for this change. That is only fair to all the hard working government officials that seem to be taking the hit for statements he is making. I would hate to think anyone would slander our citizens that work for the government with false blame. I know he is better than that.
I tagged him on this post. The first was just a cut and paste, and I asked for a screenshot and the poster came through. It was deleted by the FB group shortly thereafter.

Full disclosure I bet this person Ray's statement was true and asked to see a screenshot of this alleged email.

They provided it.
 
Went to BBQ some salmon this evening, and discovered remote startup is disabled. What a bummer, especially for those of us who live in cold, wet winter climates (Seattle). We do not cover our grill.

My recommendation to the company was that, if they were concerned about liability, they could add a waiver to the app for those of us who want to continue to use remote ignition.

The reasons given are pretty lame. Landscapers replacing a grill cover? Come on!
 
Does it really matter “who the powers that be” are? Ray takes the high road and explains why common sense says the remote start function could have unintended results. The scenario he posted is just one of the many possible scenarios. Sometimes, rules actually make sense.I know that may inconvenience a few folks but how would youn feel if your grill touched off a fire that took one or more lives? I can walk out to the patio and press the button.
I completely agree about the common sense aspect. I was surprised when I couldn’t start my Bull without going outside my house, but I am confident I’m up to walking the 30 feet to my side-porch to manually get things going. 😎 Especially because my RT-700 performs exactly as advertised and I get great food using it.

With that being said, as an attorney, I’m usually very interested in knowing the exact regulations someone relies upon to explain their actions. Ray’s statement doesn’t cite anything in particular, but even that doesn’t trouble me because if I was his lawyer, I would have suggested getting rid of the remote start feature anyway because of the scenarios others have presented in this thread, and the possibility that if one of them occurred, Rec-Teq would end up on the receiving end of a product liability lawsuit.

For me at least, in the final analysis it comes down to this: Does my Bull produce great food without the hassle, extra work, and inconsistent results with charcoal? Yes.

Does my Bull totally outstrip the performance of a “lousy bake oven” (i.e., propane grill). Yes.

So I’m OK with having to get my bulbous ass off the couch to turn it on 😂😂😂.

Just my two cents.
 
I completely agree about the common sense aspect. I was surprised when I couldn’t start my Bull without going outside my house, but I am confident I’m up to walking the 30 feet to my side-porch to manually get things going. 😎 Especially because my RT-700 performs exactly as advertised and I get great food using it.

With that being said, as an attorney, I’m usually very interested in knowing the exact regulations someone relies upon to explain their actions. Ray’s statement doesn’t cite anything in particular, but even that doesn’t trouble me because if I was his lawyer, I would have suggested getting rid of the remote start feature anyway because of the scenarios others have presented in this thread, and the possibility that if one of them occurred, Rec-Teq would end up on the receiving end of a product liability lawsuit.

For me at least, in the final analysis it comes down to this: Does my Bull produce great food without the hassle, extra work, and inconsistent results with charcoal? Yes.

Does my Bull totally outstrip the performance of a “lousy bake oven” (i.e., propane grill). Yes.

So I’m OK with having to get my bulbous ass off the couch to turn it on 😂😂😂.

Just my two cents.
JamesB,

I appreciate your perspective. I also await a citation that can be evaluated to confirm this is a regulatory compliance issue versus a business decision. Although academic in nature, My issue is with UCC 2-314 (if my memory serves its purpose), Implied /warranty: Merchantability; Usage of Trade. Subparagraph 2 addresses some responsibilities of a merchant/seller although many other paragraphs also constrain the merchant. RT’s seemingly arbitrary implementation of the ex post facto restraint/removal of an advertised feature remains suspicious at best. For me, the disclosed/advertised feature at hand (ref., remote start as listed in the operating manual and associated literature located on the RecTeq site), formed the basis for my selection of their product over competitors (ref. Yoder 640) for me. What is your perspective of the possible “bait and switch” afforded by this action should it be discovered that it was a company shielding itself from possible liability/litigation (which I understand) by removing a feature without the offer of recompense to the purchaser? I yield to your credentials and knowledge, but remain curious.
 
So......someone is perhaps being untruthful, say it aint so? :rolleyes: And the fact that we live in a country where it very much appears that a company/corporate/business can be liable for the lack of common sense or just bad luck of a consumer of their products, is beyond ludicrous to me. Common sense and critical thinking can get most people pretty far in life, but book smart and world dumb has always been a problem. I take issue with dishonesty, regardless the intent or the situation. Recourse can be justified when there is indeed a design flaw or defect of a product, otherwise more times than not it's just folks not using their brain matter very well.
 
Last edited:
I've never used the remote start. I've always started the grill manually. Its a short walk to it in the deck. But my issue is with the app itself. I start the grill, and the app NEVER recognizes that the grill is already on. I always have to 'turn it on' in the app to use the remote temp control. So last night the app updated. I turned on the grill. Opened the app. It says my grill is off...tried to turn it on, and it tells me it can no longer start the grill. But the grill is already on! Couldn't use the app at all last night. Any suggestions on how to get the app to recognize that the grill is already on?
 
I've never used the remote start. I've always started the grill manually. Its a short walk to it in the deck. But my issue is with the app itself. I start the grill, and the app NEVER recognizes that the grill is already on. I always have to 'turn it on' in the app to use the remote temp control. So last night the app updated. I turned on the grill. Opened the app. It says my grill is off...tried to turn it on, and it tells me it can no longer start the grill. But the grill is already on! Couldn't use the app at all last night. Any suggestions on how to get the app to recognize that the grill is already on?
Many years ago I had a similar problem. i contacted RT and they suggested I do a manual reset of the grill remove the app and reinstall it using a different name. I was reluctant as I liked the name I selected but followed their directions and it worked. Apparently, there was some problem/bug on their server that couldn’t recognize the name I selected and it couldn’t consistently “talk” to my Bull. Don’t know if that is your problem though. Have you contact RT tech support? They are pretty good at diagnostics.
 
oh I can understand that and I thought of that before I even purchased a grill. so all the other brands following suit then? easy option.. no grill cover they dont need them...
 
Many years ago I had a similar problem. i contacted RT and they suggested I do a manual reset of the grill remove the app and reinstall it using a different name. I was reluctant as I liked the name I selected but followed their directions and it worked. Apparently, there was some problem/bug on their server that couldn’t recognize the name I selected and it couldn’t consistently “talk” to my Bull. Don’t know if that is your problem though. Have you contact RT tech support? They are pretty good at diagnostics.
I just had some issues with the app removing 1 of my grills, called for support and in the end basically blamed the problem on me and my network even though I had no other problems 65+ devices on my network. 1 grill stayed just fine and has the same controller, they miss diaged the problem and had me buy a new controller.. that did not fix the problem I told them I was sure it was app related. 3 months and seen they had an update for the app. updated and guess what? the problem went away imagine that! so no they do NOT diag things well.
 
I don’t think I will miss the remote start that much, would prefer an ash clean out and/or pellet dump any day over the remote start/stop.
 
So.. in Summary..........

- Ray thinks he is protecting his company from possible future litigation, that could be brought by people too stupid to be operating this grill in the first place.
(No this is NOT a common sense thing, stop trying to defend irresponsible actions.) Common sense dictates you know better then to remote start your grill in those types of situations. This is just another effect the "Twinkie Defense" has had, people who are allowed to blame others for their own stupidity. Its a shift of accountability- PERIOD.
Good example.. We should ban Spoons, because it is easier to shovel more food into your mouth, which in turns makes you fatter. (If you can't see or understand the stupidity of that, Only God can help you).

- Recteq is NOT the only company that offers a remote start on their App (ex: Grilla Grills))
-GGrills hasn't removed theirs. (They did the smarter alternative and put a warning on it for those under the normal IQ threshold for our species, that could possibly buy and operate their device.)

- I bought a grill that no longer offers a feature that was part of the determining process for selecting this maker.
- while I understand the business implication/decision, there were other ways to accomplish this, without f****ng over their customers. (See aforementioned Grilla Grills)


Oddly enough, I have been on the fence this year as to whether buying a new model from RecTeq, or looking elsewhere. Seems the decision has been further assisted.
 
My smokers are covered so I have to go out to remove them anytime I smoke something. It's actually quicker than going into the app. I'm only speaking for myself when I say, it's not a game changer to me that I will no longer have that option.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top